<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lindesk &#187; KDE</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lindesk.com/tag/kde/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lindesk.com</link>
	<description>Linux - on the Desktop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 05:54:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>KDE 4.2: Stable and Shiny</title>
		<link>http://lindesk.com/2009/02/kde-42-stable-shiny-kde4/</link>
		<comments>http://lindesk.com/2009/02/kde-42-stable-shiny-kde4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 19:29:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BinnyVA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Reviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ubuntu]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[42]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[kde4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[shiny]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stable]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindesk.com/?p=173</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have <strong class="highlight">upgraded my laptop(Kubuntu 8.10) to KDE 4.2</strong>. And all is well. The laptop did not, I repeat, did not explode. As a matter of fact, its been on KDE 4.2 for the last whole week - I never got to write anything about it because of my busy schedule. For the rest of the article, I have to write 'KDE 4.2' lots of time. To save some time, I am going to short it to 42. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#Answer_to_Life.2C_the_Universe.2C_and_Everything_.2842.29">Seems appropriate</a>. So when ever you see '42', mentally replace it with 'KDE 4.2']]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/go_kde.png" alt="KDE Logo" title="KDE Logo" width="135" height="135" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-175 intro" align="right" /></p>
<p class="intro">I have <strong class="highlight">upgraded my laptop(Kubuntu 8.10) to KDE 4.2</strong>. And all is well. The laptop did not, I repeat, did not explode. As a matter of fact, its been on KDE 4.2 for the last whole week &#8211; I never got to write anything about it because of my busy schedule. For the rest of the article, I have to write &#8216;KDE 4.2&#8242; lots of time. To save some time, I am going to short it to 42. <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_phrases_from_The_Hitchhiker%27s_Guide_to_the_Galaxy#Answer_to_Life.2C_the_Universe.2C_and_Everything_.2842.29">Seems appropriate</a>. So when ever you see &#8217;42&#8242;, mentally replace it with &#8216;KDE 4.2&#8242;</p>
<p>42 looks good. And by &#8216;looks good&#8217; I don&#8217;t mean all those fancy effects. I mean <strong class="highlight">it&#8217;s usable</strong> &#8211; <a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9-installed-and-uninstalled/">unlike its 4.x predecessors</a>. You can actually get things done on it. You don&#8217;t have to hit save every other second because you know that the inevitable crash is just around the corner. 42 <strong class="highlight">fixes most of the glaring errors</strong> in the earlier releases.</p>
<p>And it does look good &#8211; yes, visually this time. They really got into gradients and shadows in this release. Lots of fancy effects as well. Some of them are actually useful, to my surprise. Usually, I just ignore the shiny things &#8211; but the &#8216;Present Windows&#8217; mode have changed my mind. It is a effect that actually has a use. To enable it, go to <strong class="highlight">System Settings &gt; Desktop &gt; Desktop Effects. Now set the &#8216;Effect for Switching Windows&#8217; to Present Windows</strong>.</p>
<p>For all you screenshot fans, here is a nice one&#8230;</p>
<p><a href="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/42_screenshot.png"><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/02/42_screenshot-300x187.png" alt="KDE 4.2 Screenshot" title="KDE 4.2 Screenshot" width="300" height="187" class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-174" /></a></p>
<p>Still, I have some complaints&#8230;</p>
<h2>Missing Widgets/Plasmoids/Whatever</h2>
<dl>
<dt>Command Widget</dt>
<dd>I want a input area in my panel that can be used to execute commands. The new Run dialog is useless for this purpose.</dd>
<dt>Bookmark Widget</dt>
<dd>In the old KDE, there was an option to add the Konqueror bookmarks to the panel &#8211; this was very, very useful for me. I cannot find this in the new version.</dd>
</dl>
<p>I am not really worried about these &#8211; I am sure the KDE team will add these soon. If they fail, there is always <a href="http://kde-look.org/index.php?xcontentmode=70x77x78">KDE-Look.org</a>. If they don&#8217;t have one, well, I could always write one myself. Tinkerability is one of the main reason I love FOSS!</p>
<h2>Bugs</h2>
<p>There is still a few bugs left &#8211; and for some reason, most of the bugs I notice seems to be in the panel side.</p>
<p>I have two panels &#8211; the bottom(with taskbar, system tray, pager, etc) and top panel(clock, quick launch, etc). Unfortunately, my top panel is having a lot of troubles. I cannot position the icons correctly &#8211; some widgets(like clock, quick launch, etc.) try to take up way more space that they actually need.</p>
<p>Also the folder view desktop mode seems to have a problem remembering the icon positions.</p>
<p>Again, not too worried &#8211; nothing big enough to cause me any trouble.</p>
<h2>Kinda Crashy</h2>
<p>Even though 42 is much more stable than 4 or 4.2 beta(Nightly neon) its still has a long way to go before it can reach the reliability of KDE 3.5. Still, since I am working on a laptop and not on a server, 42 is more than enough.</p>
<p>Anyway, whenever 42 crashes on you, use this mantra, as I do. Just tell yourself&#8230;</p>
<blockquote><p>It could be a <strong class="highlight">lot</strong> worse &#8211; I could be using Windows</p></blockquote>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lindesk.com/2009/02/kde-42-stable-shiny-kde4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fedora 9 Installed &#8211; And Uninstalled</title>
		<link>http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9-installed-and-uninstalled/</link>
		<comments>http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9-installed-and-uninstalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BinnyVA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindesk.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As promised, I installed Fedora 9 &#8211; and promptly moved back to Fedora 8. The problem is not Fedora &#8211; its KDE. KDE 4 is not yet ready for normal use. And if you are a KDE user, I would suggest that you stay away from Fedora 9. The purpose of KDE 4 is to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/fedora_logo.png" alt="Fedora Logo" title="Fedora Logo" width="110" height="40" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-33 intro" align="right" /></p>
<p class="intro"><a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9sulphur-released/">As promised, I installed Fedora 9</a> &#8211; and promptly moved back to Fedora 8. The problem is not Fedora &#8211; its KDE. KDE 4 is not yet ready for normal use. And if you are a KDE user, I would suggest that you stay away from Fedora 9.</p>
<p>The purpose of KDE 4 is to make KDE compactable with Qt4. Its not for actual use. Sure, it could be used as a desktop, but it will lack many features that you expect in KDE.</p>
<p>I am  surprised that Fedora decided to include KDE4 &#8211; despite its &#8216;alpha-ness&#8217;. But <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/KDE4FAQ">they have their reasons</a></p>
<h2>Problems With KDE4</h2>
<dl>
<dt>Customizable Panel</dt>
<dd>I could not find any options to customizing the panel &#8211; KDE 3.5 have a lot of options.</dd>
<dt>Many Options/Settings are missing.</dt>
<dd>It will be coming in the future releases &#8211; but its missing now.</dd>
<dt>Desktop Icons have no consistency</dt>
<dd>Some icons are bigger than others. On the other hand, you can rotate these icons &#8211; but I fail to see any practical application for that.</dd>
<dt>And many more&#8230;</dt>
<dd>Random crashes, dolphin, irremovable &#8216;Add Plasmoid&#8217; option on the desktop, etc.</dd>
</dl>
<p>Long story short, I am back in Fedora 8. And I will be on it until Fedora 10 is out. And even then, I&#8217;ll wait some time before upgrading.</p>
<h2>Links</h2>
<h3>Fedora 9/KDE4 Positive Reviews</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.linuxoss.com/2008/05/20/fedora-9-review/">Fedora 9 Review</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/05/14/fedora-9-and-the-road-to-kde4/">Fedora 9 and the road to KDE4</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/19762/Review-Roundup-Fedora-9">Review Roundup: Fedora 9</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.linux.com/feature/135685">Fedora 9: Leading edge or bleeding edge?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://desktoplinux.com/news/NS7497650845.html">Hats off to Fedora 9</a></li>
<li><a href="http://jonrob.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/5-reasons-why-youll-love-fedora-9/">5 Reasons Why Youâ€™ll Love Fedora 9</a></li>
<li><a href="http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2008/01/talking-bluntly.html">aseigo: talking bluntly</a></li>
<li><a href="http://nowwhatthe.blogspot.com/2008/01/kde-40-why-now.html">KDE 4.0 &#8211; why now?</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>And the Negative Ones&#8230;</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cannon-linux.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=193:fedora-9-the-unfair-review&amp;catid=12:fedora&amp;Itemid=61">Fedora 9 (The unfair review)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?p=1007974">FedoraForum &#8211; Fedora 9 and KDE 3</a></li>
<li><a href="http://theunixgeek.blogspot.com/2008/01/is-kde-4-huge-step-backwards.html">Is KDE 4 a Huge Step Backwards?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.linuxtechdaily.com/2007/12/10-things-i-hate-about-kde4-rc2/">Ten Things I Hate About KDE4 RC2+</a></li>
<li><a href="http://osnews.com/story/19159/KDE_4.0.0:_Sweet_Follows_Sour">KDE 4.0.0: Sweet Follows Sour</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9-installed-and-uninstalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Top 10 Linux MP3 Players</title>
		<link>http://lindesk.com/2008/03/top-10-linux-mp3-players/</link>
		<comments>http://lindesk.com/2008/03/top-10-linux-mp3-players/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 05:53:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BinnyVA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Applications]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[list]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mp3]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[top10]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindesk.com/2008/03/top-10-linux-mp3-players/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There are no shortage of audio players in Linux. It has everything from command line MP3 players(mpg123) to RAM eating GUI players(like Amarok). With easily available codecs, linux supports almost all available formats. This is the final post on a series about MP3 Players in linux. This series focuses on dedicated audio players &#8211; not [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src='http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/kaboodle.png' alt='Music' align="right" class="intro" /></p>
<p class="intro">There are no shortage of audio players in Linux. It has everything from command line MP3 players(<a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/02/mpg123mpg321-the-command-line-mp3-players/">mpg123</a>) to RAM eating GUI players(like <a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/09/amarok-mp3-player/">Amarok</a>). With easily available codecs, linux supports almost all available formats.</p>
<p>This is the final post on a series about MP3 Players in linux. This series focuses on dedicated audio players &#8211; not <a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/05/top-5-video-players-in-linux/">video players</a> that can handle audio as well(like mplayer). Without further ado, presenting the top 10 Linux MP3 players&#8230;</p>
<h2>1. Amarok</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/amarok_logo.png" alt="Amarok Logo" align="right" /></p>
<p>amaroK is currently the player of my choice &#8211; it rocks. Everything I ever wanted in a MP3 Player and more. It is the clear winner in this field. In my opinion, there is <strong class="highlight">nothing that beats amarok even if you look at Windows and Mac MP3 players as well</strong>.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/09/amarok-mp3-player/">Amarok MP3 Player</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/10/five-amarok-tips-and-tricks/">Five Amarok Tips and Tricks</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/09/5-improvements-for-amarok/">5 Improvements for Amarok</a></li>
</ul>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:AmaroK_stable.png"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/e/eb/AmaroK_stable.png/250px-AmaroK_stable.png" alt="Amarok Linux MP3 Player Screenshot" /></a></p>
<h4>More Information on Amarok MP3 Player</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://amarok.kde.org/">Official AmaroK site</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/AmaroK">Wikipedia Entry</a></li>
<li><a href="http://amarok.kde.org/blog/">AmaroK Blog</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>2. XMMS</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/xmms.png" alt="XMMS Logo" align="right" /></p>
<p>A Winamp clone. Simple and user friendly, it is very popular on linux. It does not have a large feature set &#8211; but I am going to give it second place due to its popularity.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/09/xmms-x-multimedia-system/">XMMS &#8211; X MultiMedia System</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/09/global-hotkeys-for-xmms-using-khotkeys/">Global HotKeys For XMMS using KHotKeys</a></li>
</ul>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/09/xmms_screenshot.png" alt="XMMS MP3 Audio Player Screenshot" /></p>
<h4>Official Sites for XMMS Player</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.xmms.org/">XMMS</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XMMS">XMMS &#8211; Wikipedia</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>3. RhythmBox</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/rhythmbox.png" alt="RhythmBox Gnome Music Player Logo" align="right" /></p>
<p>Rhythmbox Music Player is a music player and library for tagged files, that support various music formats. It was inspired by Appleâ€™s iTunes. Although it is designed to work well under the GNOME Desktop, I had no issues with it in KDE.</p>
<p><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/12/rhythmbox-gnome-music-player/">RhythmBox &#8211; Gnome Music Player</a></p>
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/3/32/Rhythmbox_0.11.2.png/300px-Rhythmbox_0.11.2.png" alt="RhythmBox Media Player Screenshot" /></p>
<h4>Official Sites</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.gnome.org/projects/rhythmbox/">Rhythmbox &#8211; The music management application for GNOME</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rhythmbox">RhythmBox &#8211; Wikipedia</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>4. Exaile</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/03/exailelogo-sml.png" alt="Exaile MP3 Player Logo" align="right" /></p>
<p>Exaile is a music player aiming to be similar to KDEâ€™s Amarok, but for GTK+ and written in Python. It incorporates many of the cool things from Amarok (and other media players)</p>
<p><a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/01/exaile-music-player-for-gtk/">Exaile &#8211; Music Player for Gtk+</a></p>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/01/exaile.png" alt="Exaile Media Player Screenshot" /></p>
<h4>Official Sites</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.exaile.org/">Official Site</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.linux.com/articles/59380">Review: Exaile Media Player</a></li>
<li><a href="http://linux.wordpress.com/2007/01/08/exaile-media-player/">Exaile Media Player</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>5. Audacious</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/audacious-logo1.png" alt="Audacious Logo" /></p>
<p>Audacious is not among the &#8216;star media-players&#8217; in Linux &#8211; so many people never try it out. But those who have tried it out like it. For the sake of the article, I installed it &#8211; and I liked it. I even considered switching from amaroK to Audacious.</p>
<p><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/10/audacious-media-player/">Audacious Media Player</a></p>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/10/audacious_screenshot.png" /></p>
<h4>Official Sites</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://audacious-media-player.org/">Audacious</a></li>
<li><a href="http://audacious-media-player.org/index.php?title=Features">Features of Audacious</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audacious_Media_Player">Audacious Media Player</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>6. Banshee</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/banshee.png" alt="Banshee Music Player Logo" align="right" /></p>
<p>Banshee is an MP3 players for Gnome. You can import, organize, play, and share your music using Banshee&#8217;s simple, powerful interface.</p>
<p><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/11/banshee-music-management-and-playback-for-gnome/">Banshee &#8211; Music Management and Playback for GNOME</a></p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:Screenshot-AlbumPic.png"><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f0/Screenshot-AlbumPic.png/250px-Screenshot-AlbumPic.png" alt="Banshee MP3 Player Screenshot" /></a></p>
<h4>Banshee Official Sites</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://banshee-project.org/Main_Page">Banshee</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Banshee_%28music_player%29">Banshee (music player)</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>7. SongBird</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/songbird.png" alt="SongBird MP3 Software Logo" align="right" /></p>
<p>SongBird is an MP3 player built on the XUL framework. It&#8217;s a desktop media player mashed-up with the Web.</p>
<p><a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/12/songbird-the-firefox-of-mp3-players/">SongBird &#8211; The Firefox of MP3 Players</a></p>
<p><img src="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/94/Songbird_screenshot.png/250px-Songbird_screenshot.png" alt="Songbird Screenshot" /></p>
<h4>Official Sites</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.songbirdnest.com/">SongBird Official Site</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Songbird_%28software%29">Songbird (software)</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>8. Juk</h2>
<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/08/juk.png" alt="Juk MultiMedia Player Logo" align="right" /></p>
<p>An audio jukebox that supports collections of MP3, Ogg Vorbis and FLAC files. It is a part of the kdemultimedia package.</p>
<p><a href="http://developer.kde.org/~wheeler/juk.html">Juk</a></p>
<p><br clear="both" /></p>
<h2>9. mpg123/mpg321</h2>
<p>mpg123 is a fast, free, minimalist, console MPEG audio player software program for UNIX and Linux operating systems.</p>
<p><a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/02/mpg123mpg321-the-command-line-mp3-players/">mpg123/mpg321 &#8211; The Command Line MP3 Players</a></p>
<h4>Official Sites</h4>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.mpg123.de/">mpg123 Homepage</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpg123">mpg123 Wikipedia Page</a></li>
<li><a href="http://mpg321.sourceforge.net/">mpg321 Homepage</a></li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mpg321">mpg321 Wikipedia Page</a></li>
</ul>
<h2>10. Other MP3 Players and Media Software&#8230;</h2>
<p>Instead of putting the last MP3 Player here, I am going to list the MP3 software that did not make it to the list&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beep_Media_Player">Beep Media Player</a></li>
<li><a href="http://wiki.xmms2.xmms.se/index.php/Main_Page">X-platform Music Multiplexing System 2 &#8211; XMMS2</a></li>
<li><a href="http://snackamp.sourceforge.net/">SnackAmp</a></li>
<li><a href="http://decibel.silent-blade.org/">Decibel Audio Player</a></li>
<li><a href="http://aqualung.factorial.hu/">Aqualung</a></li>
<li><a href="http://cactus.hey-you-freaks.de/index.php">Cactus Jukebox</a></li>
</ul>
<p>So, which is your favorite MP3 Player? Leave a comment&#8230;</p>
<p>Update: I reviewed two more players&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/03/listen-gtk-mp3-player/">Listen &#8211; Gtk MP3 Player</a></li>
<li><a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/04/mpd-music-player-daemon/">MPD &#8211; Music Player Daemon</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lindesk.com/2008/03/top-10-linux-mp3-players/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>84</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fedora 8/KDE Font Bug for Gnome Applications</title>
		<link>http://lindesk.com/2008/02/fedora-8kde-font-bug-for-gnome-applications/</link>
		<comments>http://lindesk.com/2008/02/fedora-8kde-font-bug-for-gnome-applications/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:50:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BinnyVA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gnome]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Troubleshooting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dpi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[font]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[resolution]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[size]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindesk.com/2008/02/fedora-8kde-font-bug-for-gnome-applications/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you are using Fedora 8 with KDE you may have noticed an interesting bug. Once you open some Gnome apps(for example, Exile, all the fonts in the KDE applications becomes one size smaller. If this happens, the only way to fix it is to restart the X server &#8211; or so I thought. At [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='http://lindesk.com/2007/07/install-windows-web-fontsms-core-fonts-in-linux/fonts/' rel='attachment wp-att-47' title='Fonts'><img class="intro" align="right" src='http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/07/fonts.png' alt='Fonts' /></a></p>
<p class="intro">If you are using Fedora 8 with KDE you may have noticed an interesting bug. Once you open some Gnome apps(for example, <a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/01/exaile-music-player-for-gtk/">Exile</a>, all the fonts in the KDE applications becomes one size smaller.</p>
<p>If this happens, the only way to fix it is to restart the X server &#8211; or so I thought. At first, I thought it was the issue of just one application &#8211; namely <a href="http://lindesk.com/2007/12/rhythmbox-gnome-music-player/">RhythmBox</a>.</p>
<p>But I just found that there is a simple fix for this problem&#8230;</p>
<ul>
<li>Run the command &#8216;gnome-appearance-properties&#8217;</li>
<li>Go to the &#8216;Fonts&#8217; Tab</li>
<li>Click on the &#8216;Details&#8217; Button at the bottom</li>
<li>Change the Resolution to 96 Dots per Inch(DPI)</li>
</ul>
<p><img src='http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/dpi_screenshot.jpg' alt='Changing the DPI' /></p>
<p>That should solve your problem.</p>
<p>This issue appears only if your screen resolution is bigger than normal &#8211; mine is 1440&#215;900.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lindesk.com/2008/02/fedora-8kde-font-bug-for-gnome-applications/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

