<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Lindesk &#187; upgrade</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lindesk.com/tag/upgrade/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lindesk.com</link>
	<description>Linux - on the Desktop</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 14:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Fedora 9 Installed &#8211; And Uninstalled</title>
		<link>http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9-installed-and-uninstalled/</link>
		<comments>http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9-installed-and-uninstalled/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 16:53:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>BinnyVA</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Fedora]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[KDE]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[install]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[upgrade]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lindesk.com/?p=111</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
As promised, I installed Fedora 9 &#8211; and promptly moved back to Fedora 8. The problem is not Fedora &#8211; its KDE. KDE 4 is not yet ready for normal use. And if you are a KDE user, I would suggest that you stay away from Fedora 9.
The purpose of KDE 4 is to make [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://lindesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2007/05/fedora_logo.png" alt="Fedora Logo" title="Fedora Logo" width="110" height="40" class="alignnone size-full wp-image-33 intro" align="right" /></p>
<p class="intro"><a href="http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9sulphur-released/">As promised, I installed Fedora 9</a> &#8211; and promptly moved back to Fedora 8. The problem is not Fedora &#8211; its KDE. KDE 4 is not yet ready for normal use. And if you are a KDE user, I would suggest that you stay away from Fedora 9.</p>
<p>The purpose of KDE 4 is to make KDE compactable with Qt4. Its not for actual use. Sure, it could be used as a desktop, but it will lack many features that you expect in KDE.</p>
<p>I am  surprised that Fedora decided to include KDE4 &#8211; despite its &#8216;alpha-ness&#8217;. But <a href="http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/KDE/KDE4FAQ">they have their reasons</a></p>
<h2>Problems With KDE4</h2>
<dl>
<dt>Customizable Panel</dt>
<dd>I could not find any options to customizing the panel &#8211; KDE 3.5 have a lot of options.</dd>
<dt>Many Options/Settings are missing.</dt>
<dd>It will be coming in the future releases &#8211; but its missing now.</dd>
<dt>Desktop Icons have no consistency</dt>
<dd>Some icons are bigger than others. On the other hand, you can rotate these icons &#8211; but I fail to see any practical application for that.</dd>
<dt>And many more&#8230;</dt>
<dd>Random crashes, dolphin, irremovable &#8216;Add Plasmoid&#8217; option on the desktop, etc.</dd>
</dl>
<p>Long story short, I am back in Fedora 8. And I will be on it until Fedora 10 is out. And even then, I&#8217;ll wait some time before upgrading.</p>
<h2>Links</h2>
<h3>Fedora 9/KDE4 Positive Reviews</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://blog.linuxoss.com/2008/05/20/fedora-9-review/">Fedora 9 Review</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.redhatmagazine.com/2008/05/14/fedora-9-and-the-road-to-kde4/">Fedora 9 and the road to KDE4</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.osnews.com/story/19762/Review-Roundup-Fedora-9">Review Roundup: Fedora 9</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.linux.com/feature/135685">Fedora 9: Leading edge or bleeding edge?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://desktoplinux.com/news/NS7497650845.html">Hats off to Fedora 9</a></li>
<li><a href="http://jonrob.wordpress.com/2008/04/19/5-reasons-why-youll-love-fedora-9/">5 Reasons Why Youâ€™ll Love Fedora 9</a></li>
<li><a href="http://aseigo.blogspot.com/2008/01/talking-bluntly.html">aseigo: talking bluntly</a></li>
<li><a href="http://nowwhatthe.blogspot.com/2008/01/kde-40-why-now.html">KDE 4.0 &#8211; why now?</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>And the Negative Ones&#8230;</h3>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.cannon-linux.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=article&amp;id=193:fedora-9-the-unfair-review&amp;catid=12:fedora&amp;Itemid=61">Fedora 9 (The unfair review)</a></li>
<li><a href="http://fedoraforum.org/forum/showthread.php?p=1007974">FedoraForum &#8211; Fedora 9 and KDE 3</a></li>
<li><a href="http://theunixgeek.blogspot.com/2008/01/is-kde-4-huge-step-backwards.html">Is KDE 4 a Huge Step Backwards?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.linuxtechdaily.com/2007/12/10-things-i-hate-about-kde4-rc2/">Ten Things I Hate About KDE4 RC2+</a></li>
<li><a href="http://osnews.com/story/19159/KDE_4.0.0:_Sweet_Follows_Sour">KDE 4.0.0: Sweet Follows Sour</a></li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://lindesk.com/2008/05/fedora-9-installed-and-uninstalled/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>9</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
